Affiliate ‘Flogging’ in Question

(syndicated content)

While we wait for the Federal Trade Commission to release its final revisions to its testimonials and endorsement guidelines, I’ve been talking to several experts to get a better idea of what the revisions might mean.

Last week, I spoke with Todd Harrison, Partner, Venable LLP, who focuses his practice on federal, state, and international consumer protection agencies’ rules and regulations on drugs, foods, dietary supplements and other products.

Harrison went over some situations where an advertiser might have to disclose more information, or remove certain claims, to be within the FTC’s proposed guidelines. Other practices might be explicitly prohibited altogether. One method in particular stood out to me: flogging.

Source:Affiliate ‘Flogging’ in Question

Related Posts with Thumbnails
Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • NewsVine
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Twitter
  • Technorati
  • Live
  • LinkedIn
  • MySpace
  • Blogosphere News
  • Diigo
  • E-mail this story to a friend!
  • FriendFeed
  • RSS
  • TwitThis
  • Yahoo! Bookmarks

Related articles

There are no comments yet. Be the first and leave a response!

Leave a Reply


Wanting to leave an <em>phasis on your comment?

Security Code:

Trackback URL http://www.net-marketing-strategies.com/wordpress/2486/affiliate-%e2%80%98flogging%e2%80%99-in-question/trackback/